Mathematical inquiry processes: Identify structure and notice properties; create example sets and generalise. Conceptual field of inquiry: Simultaneous equations; algebraic proof.
Students might require a structured approach to the prompt. They often overlook its key feature - that is, the three numbers in each equation are consecutive terms of a linear sequence.
In the case of the prompt, we see 2, 5, 8 and 3, 7, 11. If the class does not notice the sequences in the orientation phase, the teacher has to draw them to the students' attention.
The inquiry might continue with students attempting to find solutions for x and y by substituting in integers that simultaneously 'work' for both equations.
Whether or not the students find x = -1 and y = -2, the teacher should be prepared to lead an explanation of an algebraic method for solving simultaneous equations.
If the class is inexperienced in conducting inquiries, the teacher might prefer a more accessible prompt in which the coefficients of y are the same:
This can facilitate the development of the elimination method as students see that the differences between the left-hand and right-hand sides are 2x and 2 respectively and, thereby, intuitively eliminate the second variable. Some might have difficulty appreciating that the differences are in fact 2x and -2 when calculated formally.
When the simultaneous equations are formed of three consecutive terms of linear sequences, the solutions will always be x = -1 and y = 2. The proof is accessible to students in secondary school.
Once classes are comfortable with solving simultaneous equations, the inquiry tends to become fast-moving and multi-faceted as individuals or groups work on their own questions. Changes to the prompt have included:
Descending linear sequences (or one ascending and one descending);
Using sequences of other types, particularly quadratic and Fibonacci. Why are the solutions for the latter always x = 1 and y = 1?;
Changing both signs to subtraction or to addition and subtraction;
Representing the equations on a graph (What is the relevance of the point of intersection?); and
Using x2 or y2 or both.
At an Inquiry Maths workshop in Suzhou (China) in March 2025, Joshua Oke, Head of Mathematics at the Shanghai Community International School in Pudong, explained his alternative prompt to the participants.
He wanted his students to draw on prior learning about rearranging to convert the first equation into the form of the second, which gives 2x + 3y = 4. Both equations then involve sequences of consecutive positive integers.
Another participant in the workshop later commented that just as the solutions to the simultaneous equations formed of linear sequences are x = -1 and y = 2, the converse is also true. If the solutions to a pair of simultaneous equations are x = -1 and y = 2, then the coefficients and constant in each equation form a linear sequence.
Craig Barton, TES adviser for secondary maths, tried out the inquiry with his year 10 class. He tweeted about the lesson (below) and posted a picture of the approach taken by one student. She inquired into sequences that use the recurrence relation for the Fibonacci sequence: xn = xn-1 + xn-2. Her theory states that simultaneous equations using any three consecutive numbers in such a sequence give the solution x = 1 and y = 1.
Postscript
Since using the prompt in 2013 at the time Inquiry Maths was the subject of his podcast, Craig Barton has adopted a different approach to the teaching of mathematics based on the application of cognitive science (see the EEF review of the research). He now takes a critical position towards Inquiry Maths, decrying the time wasted compared to the supposed efficiency of explicit instruction.
Our reply to Craig notes that his new approach impoverishes the mathematics classroom by removing, amongst other things, the excitement evident in his tweet.
This is a proof from a year 12 student studying the A-level course. An alternative proof is given in the mathematical notes.