On first inspection, the prompt seems rather trivial and easy to confirm. Yet, it has proved to hold a fascination for younger secondary school students who can verify its truth but are rarely certain that the relationship will hold for 'more complicated' statements of the same type (including for percentages greater than 100). After a period in which students ask questions and make observations about the prompt, the inquiry often involves a fastpaced period of exploration with students testing different types of numbers. Once students have explained why the prompt is true, they can extend their reasoning by comparing the original prompt to other statements (below). 70 increased by 40% is the same as 40 increased by 70%. Although the additional statement is false if "same as" is taken to refer to the outcomes, the increases (28 in the case of the prompt) are the same. It follows that the gaps between the two starting numbers (40 and 70) and the outcomes (68 and 98) are also the same. A proof (right) that if the outcomes are the same, then the two starting numbers (a and b) must be the same is accessible to students as early as year 7 (grade 6). 40 increased by 70% is the same as 70 decreased by 40%. This second additional statement is also false, but it has in the past led to an inquiry to find two numbers that would make such a statement correct. The relationship between the two numbers is shown on the right. One example that arises regularly during this inquiry is: 25 increased by 50% is the same as 50 decreased by 25%. Once the general relationship is found, pairs of numbers can be generated. For example, 30 increased by 75% is the same as 75 decreased by 30%. Students can then plot values of a and b on a graph (or use graphing software) in order to explore the relationship further.
40% of 70 = 70% of 40 51% of 640 = 34% of 960 This additional statement invites students to use proportional reasoning. What do the two statements have in common that mean they are both true? The support sheet below invites students to find more pairs of the same type.
A proof of the general case The inquiry has developed into finding fractions of amounts (and fractions of fractions) when students change the prompt. Why does ^{5}/_{8}_{ }of_{ }^{2}/_{3}_{ }= ^{2}/_{3}_{ }of_{ }^{5}/_{8}? The prompt has, furthermore, led to students trying to express their observations algebraically.
You can read the questions and observations about the prompt from two year 8 mixed attainment classes here.
Resources
Support sheet Finding the percentage of a number and proportional reasoning.
Conjecturing and reasoning The conjectures and reasons above arose during a lesson involving a year 8 mixed attainment class. The teacher recorded the students' ideas and assertions and, in the next lesson, required the class to find examples and counterexamples and to explain if the conjectures were true or false. It was also an opportunity to decide if the class was dealing with a conjecture, generalisation, assertion or reason.  The first is a conjecture that is true in all cases. (The class decided that if 'in all cases' had been included in the statement, then it would have constituted a generalisation.) Students found other examples and some went on to argue that it is always true by using algebra and presenting the percentage as a fraction.
 The second is an assertion that turns out to be false. a% of a = b% of b can never be true when a ≠ b.
 The third is an attempt to explain why the prompt is true by using an analogy involving the commutative law for multiplication of positive integers.
 The fourth is a generalisation  that is, the two numbers must sum to 110. The 'in all cases' is inferred from the statement. One counter example (for example, 20% of 40 = 40% of 20) shows this to be false.
 Developing an inquiry These questions and observations come from Emma Rouse's year 9 mixed attainment class. Emma explains how her students respond to inquiry lessons: "This lesson was to introduce the new topic of percentages to my year 9 class. Last year I started to teach the students through inquiry and they love making up questions. The inquiry was full of conjecturing and learning and the students loved discussing other peoples' questions and comments." On twitter, Emma declared that "If I could teach inquiry everyday I would." Below are examples of students' responses to the prompt and a display that Emma has created in her classroom.
Emma Rouse is a Lead Practitioner at Brittons Academy (Rainham, east London, UK). You can follow her on twitter @Emmaths1618. Extending learning through inquiry After attending the Inquiry Maths workshop at the Mixed Attainment Maths conference in January 2018, Laura Katan used the percentages prompt with her girls' maths club. The girls were delighted with the results of their attempts to generalise from the properties of the prompt. Laura is a teacher on the Teach First programme at Park View School in Haringey (London, UK). Her head of department, Olly McGregor Hamann, posted the picture on twitter. Olly reports that the department will be running its first inquiry (intersecting sequences) with year 8 in late February 2018. Learning through inquiry These pictures were posted on twitter by the Mathematics Department of Wellfield High School (Leyland, UK). They come from Miss Jackson’s Year 8 class. The department reports that the inquiry led to “fantastic learning” and students “made so much progress that we are planning to use one inquiry in each unit.” One student asked, “Can we do inquiries every lesson?” Overall, the department summarises the students’ response to the prompt as “amazing”. You can follow Wellfield Maths department on twitter @WellfieldMaths1.
Adapting the prompt An important feature about a prompt is that it is set just above the understanding of the class to arouse curiosity and generate conjectures without intimidating students by being too 'difficult'. The prompt, then, must take into account the prior learning of the class. One secondary maths department decided to use the percentages prompt with all their setted year 8 classes. Teachers were concerned that the prompt would be too easy for the higher attaining classes, but too difficult for students with the lowest prior attainment. With these concerns in mind, the prompt was changed in the following ways to provide enough intrigue at each level:10% of 50 = 50% of 10 40% of 70 = 70% of 40 47% of 74 = 74% of 47 20% of 30% of 40 = 40% of 30% of 20 The lower attaining students explored examples involving multiples of 10 guided heavily by the teacher; the higher sets regulated their activity with the regulatory cards and finished with students presenting their proofs for the conjecture that "the order does not matter."
Year 8 students start the inquiry
