Mathematical inquiry processes: Verify and extend to other cases; identify patterns; generalise and prove. Conceptual field of inquiry: Square and cube roots; rounding (decimal places and significant figures); proof.
The prompt introduces the concept of rounding to classes in years 7 and 8 (grades 8 and 9). As students round square roots to the nearest whole number, they realise that two square roots round to 1, four round to 2, six round to 3, and, in general, 2n round to n (see the spreadsheet for the square roots of the numbers from one to 100). Once students have a clear understanding of the prompt's meaning, they take great delight in showing that it is true.
During the inquiry students develop fluency in rounding. However, the teacher should guide students in the degree of accuracy they use at each stage of the inquiry to avoid the following two misconceptions:
When students round the square roots of numbers less than 100 to one significant figure, they find the nearest positive integer. For example, the square root of 12 appears as 3.464101615 on a calculator. As the square root (x) is in the range 2.5 ≤ x < 3.5, the square root of 12 is three to the nearest integer. However, rounding to one significant figure at the start of the inquiry has led to students truncating square roots instead of rounding. The square root of 13 (3.605551275) will also 'round' to three, they reason, because there is a three in the units column.
A misconception involving a 'double rounding' can also arise when students round square roots to one decimal place. The square root of 12, rounded to one decimal place, is 3.5. Students have then rounded for a second time, arguing that 3.5 rounds up to four.
To avoid misconceptions at the launch of the inquiry, the teacher might guide the class to round to two decimal places. In that case the square root of 12 rounds to 3.46, which is lower than 3.5 and, therefore, closer to three than four.
As students become more confident, the teacher can guide them to use other degrees of accuracy.
In the initial phase of the inquiry, students attempt to make meaning of the prompt. Responses in the question, notice, and wonder phase include:
Rounding can be to the nearest 10 or 100;
Square roots are something to do with squares. An example of a square number is 16 beause 4 x 4 = 16.
What is a positive integer?
Does n stand for a number? What is 2n?
The teacher should be ready to draw out as much relevant knowledge as the class holds and draw upon students' contributions.
In a structured approach, the teacher might break the inquiry into stages: at first, students use a calculator to find the square roots of the numbers from one to 20; afterwards, they round the roots to the nearest positive integer.
In this way, students can participate in the inquiry without having a clear understanding of the 'big picture'. The full meaning of the prompt might emerge only once the class reflects on the results (see the table below from the slides) and when the teacher orchestrates a discussion on the aim of the inquiry.
The inquiry develops into cube roots and fourth roots, whereupon the patterns become intriguing. The cube roots seem to follow a pattern for the first three positive integers.
The sequence 3, 12, 27 can be expressed algebraically as 3n2. We would expect 48 to follow for n = 4. However, it turns out that 49 cube roots round to four. The number of cube roots that round to n is, in fact, 3n2 + 0.25, which means that every fourth case has one more than 3n2. The first eight results are 3, 12, 27, (49), 75, 108, 147, (193).
The sequence is surprising for students who are used to finding neat patterns in mathematics lessons. However, the rounding of cube roots reinforces the idea that patterns do not necessarily continue after the first few cases. The mathematician requires a proof to be convinced that they do.
June 2026
The slides contain lines of inquiry based on six regulatory cards. In a guided inquiry, pairs of students suggest how the inquiry could proceed by selecting a card and justifying their selection to the class. For a detailed description of the meaning of each card in the context of the inquiry, see the lines of inquiry below.
By selecting this card, students might require a definition of a positive integer or an explanation about square roots or rounding. If the request for an explanation is widespread in the class, the teacher should co-construct an understanding of the concepts with an opportunity to practise or generate examples after each one.
Selection of this card suggests students understand the big picture (or, at least, are aware of what is involved to determine if the prompt is true), but are not confident in part of the process. As students show their card to the class, the teacher asks what the students want to practise to ensure they have an legitimate activity in mind.
Selection of this card suggests that the students understand the meaning of the prompt and want to generate results to confirm or refute its contention. Even if that is the case, the teacher should still require them to verbalise their thinking in order to scaffold the inquiry process for other students who do not have such a developed understanding.
The class uses the 'What-if-not?' strategy to change the prompt:
What if the roots are not square?
What if we do not round the roots?
The teacher could model the strategy to extend the inquiry, guiding students to explore cube roots, fourth roots, and so on. The class might also explore truncating the roots but only if that does not risk sowing misconceptions about rounding.
The number of square roots that round to n is 2n; the number of cube roots that round to n is 3n2 + 0.25. If we were to extend the pattern, would the number of fourth roots that round to n be 4n3 + 0.5? After using a calculator to find, say, the first 20 cube and fourth roots, the teacher might encourage students to use this spreadsheet or design their own.
The majority of students in the younger years of secondary school have difficulty accessing the proof that the number of square roots that round to n is 2n. However, the teacher could give the proofs for square and cube roots as a challenge to those with the highest prior attainment.